4 ms·

You can also buy from companies that hire licensed software engineers if you want to? The main thing that would stop people patronising licensed individuals is

by roenxi 2mo ago

You can also buy from companies that hire licensed software engineers if you want to? The main thing that would stop people patronising licensed individuals is if there was no obvious skill gap between a licensed and unlicensed practitioner that justifies the price gap. People don't need a government body to tell them to check for credentials. If people care they can ask (I had to give a copy of my degree certificate thingo to my employer a job or two ago, they cared that I was qualified). The whole and only point of mandating licensing is to raise prices for consumers. EDIT Just while I'm thinking about it, the law is expected to be easy enough for everyone to follow while simultaneously there is is an absurd legal fiction that only a licensed professional can talk sensibly about the law. It is internally inconsistent that lawyers would require a license.

breezybottom 2mo ago
That's the absurd libertarian logic. I'm supposed to be able to assess the credibility of whatever credentials I'm shown? Despite having no expertise in the field?
- sadlyuramoron 2mo ago
  [dead]
- roenxi 2mo ago
  The government can sponsor a credential if that helps you? The libertarian position isn't that the government can't have a position on what the standard should be, just that people who think there is a more cost-effective standard should be allowed to use them. Much like how you can hire a programmer based on that you think their work is good or they made a lot of money programming, rather than just limiting yourself to the people who went to some fancy university. If you don't feel competent at assessing programmer quality then you can exclusively hire ex-Google or MIT programmers or what have you and pay an absurd premium for the most credentialed US developers. But most people don't need to do that.
jjmarr 2mo ago
I'm getting work experience to become a licensed software engineer, which is possible in my jurisdiction (Ontario). Rarely does anybody care. I heard it's useful for safety-critical stuff but have never met anyone who has made use of the designation.

by roenxi 2mo ago

breezybottom 2mo ago

That's the absurd libertarian logic. I'm supposed to be able to assess the credibility of whatever credentials I'm shown? Despite having no expertise in the field?

sadlyuramoron 2mo ago
[dead]
roenxi 2mo ago
The government can sponsor a credential if that helps you? The libertarian position isn't that the government can't have a position on what the standard should be, just that people who think there is a more cost-effective standard should be allowed to use them. Much like how you can hire a programmer based on that you think their work is good or they made a lot of money programming, rather than just limiting yourself to the people who went to some fancy university. If you don't feel competent at assessing programmer quality then you can exclusively hire ex-Google or MIT programmers or what have you and pay an absurd premium for the most credentialed US developers. But most people don't need to do that.

jjmarr 2mo ago

I'm getting work experience to become a licensed software engineer, which is possible in my jurisdiction (Ontario). Rarely does anybody care. I heard it's useful for safety-critical stuff but have never met anyone who has made use of the designation.