That article is one of the most obvious examples of "Claude style" I've ever seen. Anyway. Software patents are generally unenforceable. This one is extra un

That article is one of the most obvious examples of "Claude style" I've ever seen. Anyway. Software patents are generally unenforceable. This one is extra unenforceable. It's so weak that they won't even be able to play patent troll and bully small companies with it. Also, I'm sure that somebody has already put in a request with the USPTO for an "Ex Parte Reexamination." This allows for a newly-granted patent to be challenged on prior art or patentability/obviousness grounds. The fee is something like $6000, so it's rare as most patents are hardly worth that much to begin with, but I could see it happening here. In short, this was pointless on Mistral's part and a PR own-goal. Nobody else ought to be concerned.