2 ms·
The equivalent is probably weird, proprietary DSLs / standard libraries that AI has not been able to ingest so it performs poorly on. But maybe these days LLMs
by DC-3 1mo ago
The equivalent is probably weird, proprietary DSLs / standard libraries that AI has not been able to ingest so it performs poorly on. But maybe these days LLMs don't even really struggle with these sorts of domains.
- edot 1mo agoYeah I’d have to imagine that as long as you have the same fundamental ideas (variables, functions, loops, arrays, etc.) the syntax doesn’t matter at all. Plus it can just try, see and error, and read the error. I doubt there’s a language out there that they haven’t a) ingested and b) can’t handle. I think perhaps the equivalent would be “this environment quite literally can’t support having an LLM attached to it”, as in say some totally airgapped AND low-performance things (industrial computing, PLCs, military stuff, etc.).