>Is it wrong that they want to put in all in place? You seem to be operating under the assumption that there is a definitive answer here. There isn't, and this

>Is it wrong that they want to put in all in place? You seem to be operating under the assumption that there is a definitive answer here. There isn't, and this is completely subjective. The idea that 300M+ people will agree on such a question, to me, is ridiculous. It is really a matter of 2 questions: 1) How many false positives are acceptable? 2) Are we willing to accept the consequences if this information falls into the wrong hands? Reasonable people will disagree on the answers, and I believe the U.S. was the last country founded (granted, on the lands of others') upon the idea that freedom and individual rights (over the collective) should be maximized. More and more, as the U.S. has matured we've seen and continue to see the collective rights being prioritized. To be clear, I am not sure where I stand personally, but I am simply trying to objectively point out what I see.