This is a terrible idea. It sounds like the way they're going to do this is by looking at specific word choices, which is the standard say AI "detection" curren

This is a terrible idea. It sounds like the way they're going to do this is by looking at specific word choices, which is the standard say AI "detection" currently works. The problem is that if it is "undetectable" then it is fully valid language, and if its fully valid language, someone likely talks/writes like that. A lot of my pre AI era work flags detectors, and having pre-ai work that flags detectors is the only defense I have. Others might not be so lucky. Any FP on these things have disasterous consequences for the accused, who are now guilty until they can prove their innocence, and so this is a deeply irresponsible thing to market or give any credibility to. For a company that is too sloppy to properly contain it's ai and prevevent "it" from hacking other services, how could we possibly trust them to not fuck this up? There's even less incentive for them here to not get it wrong, so getting it wrong is in my expectation a given. This is dismal.