3 ms·
great for mobile apps, fine for desktops, basically unusable for browsers unless you do wasm, if web can be revamped/improved it can be the best option for cros
by synergy20 2mo ago
great for mobile apps, fine for desktops, basically unusable for browsers unless you do wasm, if web can be revamped/improved it can be the best option for cross platform GUI
- tonyhart7 2mo agono one and absolutely no one pick flutter because they want do traditional web in the first place its a cross platform framework that you can share component between mobile and other platform and always has been
- 999900000999 2mo agoI’ve used flutter for a couple of toy web apps. One is just a personal tool , another is a small party game. Now I might vibe code such things using React, but 5 , 6 years ago Flutter got me what I wanted fast. Firebase integration is absurdly easy. You can make a crud app in about 30 minutes
- tonyhart7 2mo agoYes but its best work with SPA or WASM type of app like games for example
- 999900000999 2mo agoIt's probably not the best for anything in particular. It's the fastest way to build something if you're not a big html person. I've never particularly been good at hmtl tbh. The older I get, the more I'm concerned with the ease of tools/frameworks vs what's the most optimal.
- tonyhart7 2mo agoits good at mobile, developer experience simply just better compared to java,kotlin xml UI declaration back then
- eklavya 2mo agoYou are in luck then, use jaspr.
- kdot 2mo agoI love this framework! It offers all the benefits of Dart and the Flutter widget paradigm on the web, while still providing access to the DOM. I'm using Jaspr for all of my marketing sites. It's beautiful, and I can ship in minutes.
- JimDabell 2mo ago> basically unusable for browsers unless you do wasm Relying on WASM means that nobody on Apple platforms who has Lockdown Mode enabled for better security will be able to use it.
- sevenzero 2mo agoI see that as a win