everybody I know always says wikipedia is a non-trustworthy source of encyclopedic information (unless verifiable in some other source). And plus there are seve

everybody I know always says wikipedia is a non-trustworthy source of encyclopedic information (unless verifiable in some other source). And plus there are several wikipedias out there, it is open source - and it doesn't even make 1/1000 of the money GOOG does! in what sense is it a monopoly?