I think you miss the simple point I'm trying to make: context can be a practical form of working memory. You said > There are no past experiences. I'm saying

I think you miss the simple point I'm trying to make: context can be a practical form of working memory. You said > There are no past experiences. I'm saying that if the context contains something added in the past, it's functionally no different than a "past experience". For example, a context that is a chat log you had with the LLM. If you tell the LLM to remember a word, continue your conversation, and then tell it to recall that word, the system can recall that past experience. That "memory" that is the context feed to the LLM is a form of memory, in some cases. Now you say, "but that chat log storage that you send to the LLM is not part of the LLM!" and then I say "see above".