3 ms·
This blog conflates productivity with expertise. Are LLMs rewarding experienced developers with tons of productivity gains? Yes. Are LLMs actively degrading t
by jplusequalt 2mo ago
This blog conflates productivity with expertise.
Are LLMs rewarding experienced developers with tons of productivity gains? Yes.
Are LLMs actively degrading their expertise of understanding code? Also yes.
This article has made the implicit assumption that the top quartile of engineers are immune from skill decline. They're not. If you're an engineer who increasingly outsources the planning, writing, and analysis of code to an LLM, you're losing your ability to plan, write, and analyze code.
All of this is to say--senior engineers who have fully adopted AI tools are blowing smoke up their asses to dodge the reality of their own obsolescence. The senior engineers can talk about productivity all day, but they're only marginally closer to understanding a complex system that was written by LLMs than the "middle class" of engineers are.
You reading this--yes you--get over yourself. Your skills are depreciating too.
- florianherrengt 2mo ago[dead]
- Alephinitesimal 2mo ago[flagged]
- jplusequalt 2mo ago>What matters is whether you understand the change being made. If you don’t, then you’re not adding much value, because the LLM can do that part better and faster than you anyway. My point is that your ability to understand what a change is doing is tied to your ability to write and analyze code in the first place. If you no longer engage with either of those (also your ability to review requires you still understand how to write effective code), then AI will be removing you too.