3 ms·

But sooner or later for AI to reach its true potential we need to have HOTL ie Human Out of the Loop. Meta prompting or using AI to develop the prompt by coaxin

by la6479 2mo ago

But sooner or later for AI to reach its true potential we need to have HOTL ie Human Out of the Loop. Meta prompting or using AI to develop the prompt by coaxing it to ask relevant questions , creating specs and going through multiple loops with LLMs - things like this can be a good start towards the final goal. Final means the over abundance of goods and services like the men of the millenium are suggesting us mere mortals will reach one day,. .. and work will be optional.

bobthepanda 2mo ago
Alternatively, cutting out labor just results in mass poverty except for the moneyed few, and a new era of technofeudalism. It seems pretty clear that the current crop of executives strongly prefer the latter scenario.
goatlover 2mo ago
Pretty big assumptions that we will get a UBI that everyone can live comfortably on, that there will be optional jobs for anyone who wants to work, and even given the first two, that there won't be massive wealth and power accumulation at the top, even more than today.
bothers 2mo ago
> Final means the over abundance of goods and services like the men of the millenium are suggesting us mere mortals will reach one day,. .. and work will be optional. Yeah, that sure sounds like paperclip maximizing hypercapitalists. Real big on sharing, not so big on minding the cost, but they just can't show their love for us all while employee labor still has some value to them. Once that's out of the way and they've taken or mulched everything of value from others, that's... that's when they'll start giving it all back, yeah. I know the sarcasm isn't helpful. But goddamn I can't understand this take, I don't know why people believe people-shaped entities like [your favorite wealthy sociopath's name here] will become society's mommy if given the power, and it's incredibly fscking frustrating. Like people who think once their home and everything is burned to the ground, the fire will rebuild everything, but better.

by la6479 2mo ago

bobthepanda 2mo ago

Alternatively, cutting out labor just results in mass poverty except for the moneyed few, and a new era of technofeudalism. It seems pretty clear that the current crop of executives strongly prefer the latter scenario.

goatlover 2mo ago

Pretty big assumptions that we will get a UBI that everyone can live comfortably on, that there will be optional jobs for anyone who wants to work, and even given the first two, that there won't be massive wealth and power accumulation at the top, even more than today.

bothers 2mo ago

> Final means the over abundance of goods and services like the men of the millenium are suggesting us mere mortals will reach one day,. .. and work will be optional. Yeah, that sure sounds like paperclip maximizing hypercapitalists. Real big on sharing, not so big on minding the cost, but they just can't show their love for us all while employee labor still has some value to them. Once that's out of the way and they've taken or mulched everything of value from others, that's... that's when they'll start giving it all back, yeah. I know the sarcasm isn't helpful. But goddamn I can't understand this take, I don't know why people believe people-shaped entities like [your favorite wealthy sociopath's name here] will become society's mommy if given the power, and it's incredibly fscking frustrating. Like people who think once their home and everything is burned to the ground, the fire will rebuild everything, but better.