3 ms·
That's not a good argument against ALPRs because citizens can theoretically set up an ALPRs too.
by gruez 2mo ago
That's not a good argument against ALPRs because citizens can theoretically set up an ALPRs too.
- jmalicki 2mo agoAnd do! A lot of newer home security cameras have ALPRs so you can set up rules like "if a car with a plate number not on this whitelist pulls up on my driveway send me an SMS"
- cmiles8 2mo agoTrue, but I’d imagine if a few techies in the community setup an open-ALPR network and started a website “where is the police chief and all his family vehicles .com” that the police department’s views towards the free and open use of such data without a warrant would change quite quickly. So long as that data was only collected on public streets it would be perfectly legal.
- pibaker 2mo agoLocal Techie Famous For "DIY Flock" Dead With Bullet Holes On the Back Of His Head after Traffic Stop. Police Chief Deems It Suicide And Calls For Better Mental Health Resources.
- convolvatron 2mo agoa single person can't set up a fine-grained nationwide network of cameras with a unified search interface that lets one track everyones daily movements.
- gruez 2mo agoSo by that logic, nation-wide ABPs are also illegal, because a single person can't rally the entire country's law enforcement to find someone?
- trollbridge 2mo agoA nationwide APB is not an investigative activity.
- gruez 2mo agoNeither is writing down license plates.
- TaLiTr 2mo agoYes, it is. If you were investigating a business or building, you would document vehicles coming and going.
- trollbridge 2mo agoYes it is. Non-investigating would be tasks like: - counting the number of vehicles going by - radar’ing every car to produce a report on how many people are speeding and how much - checking all licence plates for valid registrations to produce a report on what percentage of cars have expired tags on the road.
- jjk7 2mo agoNo, but accessing and searching the database is.
- etdznots 2mo agoIt’s not that police can’t use tools that arent available to the general public. It’s that in the US we have the plain view doctrine which defines the boundary between the things that can be plainly observed in public, which don’t constitute a search and thus don’t trigger the 4a protections, and observations that are not plain view observations and which are a search and trigger 4a protections
- gruez 2mo agoOP's contention is that private citizens don't have access to a network of cameras to look for license plates and therefore it isn't "plain view", but I don't see how that's different than law enforcement being able to muster the entire nation's cops to look for a suspect.
- baby_souffle 2mo agoI actually have set up a few! On my property, not every major intersection in town, though.
- TheCoelacanth 2mo agoCitizens can theoretically use long-distance microphones too. The criteria is whether they commonly do, not whether it's possible.
- trollbridge 2mo ago"we weren't allowed to use equipment that wasn't common for normal people to use." Is it common for normal people to set up and use ALPRs?
- Scion9066 2mo agoIt's already prohibited in a number of states and I'd bet that if citizens tried to do that at any scale, then laws would be quickly passed to make the state and its corporate partners the only ones allowed to do so everywhere else.