4 ms·
The invitation is automated
by jklinger410 2mo ago
The invitation is automated
- Starman_Jones 2mo agoDid Meta set up the selection criteria for the automated selection system?
- jklinger410 2mo agoThe criteria does not make value judgements about the content of the creator. Unless they are banned or suspended by the entire platform.
- mikeocool 2mo agoOh, that’s good, because if you automate something then you’re automatically absolved from all responsibility for its actions. And you certainly shouldn’t bother monitoring what it’s doing.
- jklinger410 2mo agoIf you want to write misleading articles to get clicks, it makes it a lot more interesting if it sounds like there's a lot of intentionality behind what META is doing. In reality META has simply not banned or restricted these accounts from monetization. That's it! But that doesn't make for an exciting headline.
- WorldMaker 2mo agoThat's assuming inaction doesn't have intentionality behind it. Meta has proven many times that its inaction is often intentional. But also, maybe more importantly, as soon as money changing hands is involved, that's a business transaction and if you aren't watching like a hawk who your business transacts with, then yes that is often assumed intentional (and classically a sign of a bad business) because it shows up in your accounts and impacts your bottom line.
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- tsol 2mo agoIf it's been brought to their attention before and they haven't done anything, then it effectively is intentional.
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]