4 ms·
Haha…So, to be clear, I was giving you the option to respond to his main, consistent argument as a courtesy because you didn’t want to respond point by point.
by ofjcihen 2mo ago
Haha…So, to be clear, I was giving you the option to respond to his main, consistent argument as a courtesy because you didn’t want to respond point by point.
I see though that you don’t seem to want to do that either. It’s more that you just really don’t want him to be right is what I’m gathering, which is fine honestly.
I’m confused by your distaste for what he’s saying though. The failure of OAI or Anthropic doesn’t mean AI is bad or goes away, just that cheaper/local models turned out to be the right price point. Do you have some specific desire to see these two labs succeed?
- minimaxir 2mo agoYou are cleanly demonstrating why people don't respond to these arguments: it's a waste of time for everyone involved because the goalposts always move.
- ofjcihen 2mo agoNah, these goalposts have stayed exactly where they began. I just don’t think anyone here actually has an argument against him. I’ll be glad to hear any argument at this point but if we don’t have one yet (other than “he’s wrong because I have a side business selling AI products/services”) I don’t think one is coming.