3 ms·
In my case it was interesting to note that the same prompt with different "Cringe Style" uses the exact same food analogy for a topic of tube amp superiority.
by ZoomZoomZoom 2mo ago
In my case it was interesting to note that the same prompt with different "Cringe Style" uses the exact same food analogy for a topic of tube amp superiority.
Vulnerability:
> Digital modeling amps are the Bluetooth earbuds of guitar amplification. Technically impressive. Completely missing the point. A Kemper can model a 1959 Plexi the way a photograph can model a meal.
Truth To Power:
> A modeling amp will simulate 47 vintage amplifiers and nail exactly none of them. It is a photograph of food. It looks correct. You cannot eat it.
Another anecdote supporting the opinion that gluing the words in coherent paragraphs can hide the shallowness of the conceptual grasp behind it pretty well.
PS: Had to override the JS to lift the limit a bit to paste the whole "crystal lattice" quote by Dumble.
- allcharm 2mo agoYou're right, repetition can be an issue. I have anti-repetition logic on the opening sentences (it passes recent openers back in and tells the model to avoid them), but nothing on reused metaphors and analogies. And there are definite grooves the model likes to default to (the number 47, for instance, and people named Gerald).