4 ms·
Yes, but maybe you know how it is... similar to that threshold where "I've done this three times before, if I had automated it, I'd maybe have spent the same am
by ycombiredd 2mo ago
Yes, but maybe you know how it is... similar to that threshold where "I've done this three times before, if I had automated it, I'd maybe have spent the same amount of time writing the automation, but the fourth time on would be free" and doing the sort of quick on-the-fly gut-math cost/benefit analysis that either results in an eventual time savings to be celebrated, or a "dammit, I should have just done this by hand again" unique type of regret.
So for this particular set of words and timing, I found I really disliked eyeballing the lines and doing quick time arithmetic and sanity checks because there were no obvious errors the two or three passes I made. So I found myself making a quick script to return the differences, to try to see what odd combination might be triggering a bug, etc. plus although what you see now looks like just standard subtitles, the original burn of them used some of the ass format's unique rendering capabilities and, as with the one-off script type automation cost/benefit.. I think it's actually cool enough and potentially useful for other cases (generative TTS/ai vocals, etc) that even if I never make another "rap"-style track and video, someone else is likely to encounter the same problem and find this solution useful.
But probably mostly it's a combination of sunk cost fallacy and stubbornness, with some laziness and fatigue thrown on top that has now a video for a song I wanted to share with whoever it might reach with broken subtitles and an unfinished tool to correct them.