IDK. At my job it seems like it's expected you'll use it in that way. In academia they've got their own concerns of 'purity,' (not least of which is justifying

IDK. At my job it seems like it's expected you'll use it in that way. In academia they've got their own concerns of 'purity,' (not least of which is justifying their continued existence which is in my opinion hard to do) and they are the ones who are going to want most strongly to punish anyone who uses AI. And perhaps "journalists," who will want to trumpet the latest government's press release being [what they'll portray as] mostly AI-generated, as a headline-grabbing "gotcha." Ironically, that may even be a story that'll be written by a fully-autonomous journalist "agent" in a newsroom that's been pruned of all human journalists! But in business it seems to me that we're all agreeing that it's a "good" use of AI to write in that way.