3 ms·
Well, maybe, but could that not also be the chance thing I mentioned? That it greatly increases odds, but a 'great increase' of 1% per decade is still not more
by lucb1e 2mo ago
Well, maybe, but could that not also be the chance thing I mentioned? That it greatly increases odds, but a 'great increase' of 1% per decade is still not more than a third of the cases or so. Or it's the bypass charging that a sibling comment mentioned indeed