4 ms·
Sure but at those times C and C++ had no immediate replacement, and if you were doing embedded C/C++ was your only option. The same cannot be said for Mojo.
by redlewel 2mo ago
Sure but at those times C and C++ had no immediate replacement, and if you were doing embedded C/C++ was your only option.
The same cannot be said for Mojo.
- mike_hearn 2mo agoThere were competitors. Pascal and assembly, most obviously. It was just a different culture. There was no expectation that everything should be free.
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- pjmlp 2mo agoIn that regard yes, personally I think Mojo has lost its opportunity, but not due being commercial. AMD/NVIDIA/Intel now having first class support for Python DSLs or GPU JITs for their APIs, and Julia as well.