I read the original paper they're basing this off of and I think you're right. I do wonder how much of a quality tradeoff there is with perturbing the next toke

I read the original paper they're basing this off of and I think you're right. I do wonder how much of a quality tradeoff there is with perturbing the next token probability distribution. My intuition tells me that a more "prominent" watermark will necessarily degrade output quality. If they are trying to balance quality and watermark prominence, I wonder if that affects the FPR.