4 ms·
This is laughable security. People claim security is now "solved" thanks to AI but from where I am standings it looks more like the fun 90ies making a return.
by throwa356262 2mo ago
This is laughable security. People claim security is now "solved" thanks to AI but from where I am standings it looks more like the fun 90ies making a return.
Anyway, can someone explain the part about K3? What are they trying to say?
- qrios 2mo agoThe interesting part is what they try to not to say: More indications for K3 is based on distillation from Claude and GPT. From [1]: > As you might guess, this suggests that distilling reasoning traces may have been possible for a long time without ever breaking the cryptography. > An anecdote: we find that prefilling Kimi-K3 reasoning with a few tokens of Opus reasoning measurably shifts its response toward Opus’s > A small memorization analysis showed that specific Claude and GPT reasoning spans are up to ~6 orders of magnitude easier to extract from Kimi-K3 than from the next-closest model. [1] https://x.com/kotekjedi_ml/status/2087147042888114428?s=42 https://x.com/kotekjedi_ml/status/2087147042888114428?s=42
- neuroelectron 2mo agoSecurity is solved, but business needs overrides it
- varenc 2mo agoThe part about K3 is just very strong evidence that K3 is partly a distillation of Opus. Probably even a distillation of Opus's CoT, which means they already had broken CoT encryption themselves awhile ago.