4 ms·
I guess this is where our true colors show. There's a significant contingent of HNers who always dunk on LLM text detectors and claim that they can't possibly w
by matherial 2mo ago
I guess this is where our true colors show. There's a significant contingent of HNers who always dunk on LLM text detectors and claim that they can't possibly work, that they ruin careers, etc. But now that a lab says "OK, we'll add a real watermark", the reactions are overwhelmingly that it's still somehow wrong.
Why do feel so entitled to being able to pass LLM-generated text as our own? I get that a lot of techies aren't good at writing. I also see a lot of tech hustlers who like to use LLMs to fake human connection and compassion - I've gotten LLM-generated recruiting emails that talked at length about how the recruiter "valued" my work. Just because we found a "cheat" button doesn't mean it's wrong for others to want to know.
Yes, LLMs are great. So is transparency. If you think an LLM writing is your new superpower, wear that badge with pride. It might mean you will lose some business from LLM haters and win some other business from like-minded customers. C'est la vie.
- godd2 2mo ago> Just because we found a "cheat" button doesn't mean it's wrong for others to want to know. One difference perhaps is that you think using LLMs is cheating, while others do not.
- davisr 2mo agoHaving a ghostwriter in your ordinary life is absolutely cheating. It's letting someone, or something, else write for you and pass it off as your own. Personally, I'm insulted any time someone sends me LLM-generated media.
- FeteCommuniste 2mo agoIt saves the non-anglophones the bother of learning to write readable English, so there's that.
- fl0id 2mo agothey might be two different sets of people
- pickleRick243 2mo ago"A detected mark provides a signal that content was processed by Claude, but is not fully conclusive." "Lack of a detected mark doesn’t mean the content wasn’t AI-generated or processed."