3 ms·
> Don't post generated text or AI-edited text. HN is for conversation between humans. from the guidelines. Your blog and other comment here look very AI edited
by nemomarx 2mo ago
> Don't post generated text or AI-edited text. HN is for conversation between humans.
from the guidelines. Your blog and other comment here look very AI edited at least, although if I'm wrong I apologize.
as for the idea in general - past performance and therefore fundamentals are pretty well known to not be predictive for stocks, and public fundamentals usually aren't good enough information to trade on. You want some specific industry knowledge, right? if you could expose that maybe you could give some advice about trends. But I think you should probably just encourage people not to hold or trade non index funds.
- caiocmpaes 2mo agoThanks for been strong about your opinion and also for asking apologies in advance in case you are wrong. (which you guys are) :D I'm not writing using AI. I'm just focusing in this side project for the last 2 years. It's right now my main side-project to transform a hobby in, maybe, a revenue source... So, I've been polishing and reviewing that article a dozen times since the beginning of this month. It has a LOT of iterations with friends on missing Data Analysis arguments and bad english. Thank you also for your topic comment: That's kind of my direction now. I want to improve the tool to focus in helping people see that a business is not a ticker and a chart. They're about knowing the forces of revenue, net income, controlling cash and debt. I just wanted to start with a feature that could easily compare my screener to others, so I build the rankings on Fundamental Data (and also Historical return). My idea is to bring more features in the quality side of analysis: Michael Porter's 5 forces, SWAT table, release earnings comments, etc.