> it's easy to think it would have been better than the lousy filters already existing. Why on earth would you assume that? It's a government imposed solution

> it's easy to think it would have been better than the lousy filters already existing. Why on earth would you assume that? It's a government imposed solution with no competition or incentive to be user friendly. If anything every politician and bureaucrat involved in the project would rather make it more restrictive to be safe than risk their own ass.