2 ms·
This is exactly the kind of flawed behaviorist centric thinking that has held AI back for the past 50 year. Until AI researchers get over their obsession with m
by slacka 14y ago
This is exactly the kind of flawed behaviorist centric thinking that has held AI back for the past 50 year. Until AI researchers get over their obsession with mathematical constructs with no foundation in biology, like symbolic AI and bayesian networks, we will never have true AI. Once you realize this, you see that this “paradox” isn't really a paradox at all.
The brain is not anything like the Von Neumann architecture of a CPU. It is a massively parallel prediction machine. High level thought occurs in cerebral cortex whose base functional unit is Hierarchical Temporal Memory composed of about 100 neurons. Once we have figured out how these units are wired in the brain, “difficult” problems like pattern recognition will be trivial, and “trival” problems like playing checkers will require many hours of training and many HTM units just like in a real human brain.
For anyone interested in this, I highly recommend Jeff Hawkins' book, “On Intelligence”.
http://books.google.com/books?isbn=0805078533 http://books.google.com/books?isbn=0805078533
- CJefferson 14y agoThis is insulting to AI researchers in the extreme. They know they are not making as good progress on "true AI" as they would like. But many researchers have tried very hard in many directions. If you are so sure true AI is fairly trivial, why not do it? Even small amounts of progress would make you very famous.
- martinced 14y ago"This is insulting to AI researchers in the extreme." Well, yes and no. If you want the entire book "On Intelligence" (which I highly recommend too) is insulting to AI researchers. The book basically explains why we're on the wrong track. To me AI is about reasoning and creativity and none of the stuff we currently have comes anywhere close to that.