3 ms·

It was quick :) … https://claudewatermarkremover.app/ https://claudewatermarkremover.app/

by sixtyj 2mo ago

shinryuu 2mo ago
Though if pangram should be trusted, there are still statistical artifacts that tells you that a text LLM generated. I don't find that to be implausible.
- timpera 2mo ago
  Alas, Pangram should not be trusted.
s_dev 2mo ago
So was it going down: "Neutralize engine is temporarily unavailable. Try again."
arcfour 2mo ago
> Honest note: Anthropic has not shipped a public Claude watermark detector yet. This tool uses rewrite-based neutralization — a meaning-preserving paraphrase with a non-Claude model — which is the attack path watermark research points to. Not affiliated with Anthropic. Well, they should have run their own AI slop website through their tool...
- nunez 2mo ago
  This attack was actually pointed out in the watermarking paper linked above. The researchers added an instruction to the prompt that switches letters like a Caesar Cipher. It lowers the quality of the output from the LLM but alters the "red list" enough for a watermark detection tool to fail at detecting the watermark.
  - fl0id 2mo ago
    also their example for rewriting just completely changes it. might as well redo it in this case (with another model or by hand)
layer8 2mo ago
Well, if the model that page uses also falls under the EU act, the output will just be watermarked differently. ;)
cush 2mo ago
Should be ensloppifier.app - it somehow makes the AI sound more like AI, while also completely changing the meaning and context of the input text From their before/after: - Certainly! -> (removed) - onboarding redesign -> revamping the introductory process - this week -> (removed) - empty states -> empty sections - CTA heirarchy -> call-to-action sequence - interviews -> discussions - aligned copy with brand voice -> verbal identity ... these choices change the meaning of the text
OrangeMusic 2mo ago
[dead]

It was quick :) … https://claudewatermarkremover.app/ https://claudewatermarkremover.app/

by sixtyj 2mo ago

It was quick :) … https://claudewatermarkremover.app/ https://claudewatermarkremover.app/

Though if pangram should be trusted, there are still statistical artifacts that tells you that a text LLM generated. I don't find that to be implausible.

timpera 2mo ago
Alas, Pangram should not be trusted.

s_dev 2mo ago

So was it going down: "Neutralize engine is temporarily unavailable. Try again."

arcfour 2mo ago

> Honest note: Anthropic has not shipped a public Claude watermark detector yet. This tool uses rewrite-based neutralization — a meaning-preserving paraphrase with a non-Claude model — which is the attack path watermark research points to. Not affiliated with Anthropic. Well, they should have run their own AI slop website through their tool...

nunez 2mo ago
This attack was actually pointed out in the watermarking paper linked above. The researchers added an instruction to the prompt that switches letters like a Caesar Cipher. It lowers the quality of the output from the LLM but alters the "red list" enough for a watermark detection tool to fail at detecting the watermark.
- fl0id 2mo ago
  also their example for rewriting just completely changes it. might as well redo it in this case (with another model or by hand)

layer8 2mo ago

Well, if the model that page uses also falls under the EU act, the output will just be watermarked differently. ;)

cush 2mo ago

Should be ensloppifier.app - it somehow makes the AI sound more like AI, while also completely changing the meaning and context of the input text From their before/after: - Certainly! -> (removed) - onboarding redesign -> revamping the introductory process - this week -> (removed) - empty states -> empty sections - CTA heirarchy -> call-to-action sequence - interviews -> discussions - aligned copy with brand voice -> verbal identity ... these choices change the meaning of the text

OrangeMusic 2mo ago

[dead]