3 ms·
>How would focusing on one of the largest new CO2 emitters not have a notable impact? Because without context you have no idea what that actually means. If yo
by Lerc 2mo ago
>How would focusing on one of the largest new CO2 emitters not have a notable impact?
Because without context you have no idea what that actually means.
If you get attacked by an unknown number of duck sized horses, how much of an effect would defeating the largest of them have?
- bix6 2mo agoSo what context do you think is missing from this debate about whether massive GHG emissions are good or bad?
- Lerc 2mo agoThat is not what this debate is about. The debate is about whether we know that the point of focus can be described as massive GHG when compared in proportion to other emitters. How much is the plant actually going to emit? Is the number the largest because the field is dominated by many many smaller things that cumulatively sum to a figure so large that if any one value (even if the largest) is removed, it makes no meaningful difference. What happens to the fuel if they don't use it? Does it get used by someone else who would otherwise had used renewables. I don't think it is unreasonable to have the relevant information to hand before making a decision. I might make the same decision as you have already done. I'd just like it to be based on actual information that I have.
- bix6 2mo agoWe have all the info we need to know this is not something we should build if we want to preserve our environment. But yeah keep pretending we don’t or whatever.