4 ms·
No, they are the ones making claims, especially their CEO saying things like a 1/10000 false positive rate. Their own testing showed a 2% rate, which is insanel
by pixl97 3mo ago
No, they are the ones making claims, especially their CEO saying things like a 1/10000 false positive rate. Their own testing showed a 2% rate, which is insanely high when you talk about the number of papers students turn in. Worse their testing methodology compared it with pre-llm documents and not post llm documents that were human written (much harder and more expensive to verify), by treating language as static.
- colesantiago 3mo agoYou're saying because it has some false positives that Pangram is 100% a scam? Is their research also a scam too? https://pangram-public.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/pdf/pangram_4_technical_report.pdf https://pangram-public.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/pdf/pangra... https://www.pangram.com/blog/pangram-4-technical https://www.pangram.com/blog/pangram-4-technical If so, what is the best one out there other than Pangram then?