> And you think the vast majority of people do not have access to the overwhelming majority of those things? The evidence suggests the opposite. The comment I

> And you think the vast majority of people do not have access to the overwhelming majority of those things? The evidence suggests the opposite. The comment I responded to asked: > Is the Apple fandom strong enough to get Tim Cook his own private army of zealots when society breaks down? I didn't say we are there now. Responding to the parent's question about a dystopian future scenario, I said that those are the resources that will become controlled by the few if "society breaks down" due to technofeudalism.