4 ms·
no, no, no. you are supposed to romanticize the hunt for correct information /s
by stringfood 2mo ago
no, no, no. you are supposed to romanticize the hunt for correct information /s
- mrweasel 2mo agoEven with the /s I think you misunderstand. If you just want to configure your router, then AI is neat. If you want to learn and understand what's going on in the router as you set it up, then being given the answers basically teaches you nothing. It's the same reason why we don't give students the answers to things, we teach them to find the answers.
- stringfood 2mo agoWhy would most people want to learn how a router works? It's the end goal that the vast majority of users want - i don't want to learn about routing tables, I just want to expose a port for plex, etc. Also, I could have AI craft a fascinating and engaging way of teaching router setup that actually helps me learn instead of wasting time searching through random forums form google results
- NateEag 2mo ago> Also, I could have AI craft a fascinating and engaging way of teaching router setup that actually helps me learn instead of wasting time searching through random forums form google results And somewhere between ten and seventy percent of what it teaches you will be anywhere from subtly wrong in minor ways to utterly flaming bullshit, and unless you go through the boring, slow, old-fashioned learning methods, you'll have no way to know.
- stringfood 2mo agoyes but last year it was between 20 and 80 percent, point being talk to me in 10 years and all errors around router behaviour will be completely missing from AI teaching tools