4 ms·
I don't think you can characterize the discussion around then as simple calling for caution. There was a serious attempt to keep all access to even very basic L
by timmmmmmay 2mo ago
I don't think you can characterize the discussion around then as simple calling for caution. There was a serious attempt to keep all access to even very basic LLM techniques locked into essentially an exclusive guild.
- Forgeties79 2mo agoIf you grab the most extreme examples you can argue anything. The general feeling was “exercise caution” and “we need to think about this.”
- iugtmkbdfil834 2mo agoOh stop, the current crop of kneecapping llms is already bad enough with how they cripple those. It would have been even worse if the 'we need to think about this' crowd kept the reins. At least now, we can have both: safe corporate crap and whatever you want llm.
- Forgeties79 2mo ago>oh stop No, you stop. You don’t know me we are not friends. Please do not talk to me like that.
- iugtmkbdfil834 2mo agoHow do you know we are not friends? I am not even joking. Can you be certain? And if yes, how?
- Forgeties79 2mo agoDon’t be an ass, you are either “joking” or didn’t think about this for more than 4 seconds. You don’t know who I am, you don’t know my name, even if we know each other in real life you literally do not know who I am right now. Have a good rest of your week
- iugtmkbdfil834 2mo agoNone of your questions really invalidate anything and you assume a lot. FWIW, I was joking, but did you know in stylometry, punctuation tends to remain surprisingly stable?
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]