3 ms·
I don’t like the idea of hacking a response to contain a watermark. I also don’t like the idea of false positives detections coming directly from Anthropic. If
by case540 2mo ago
I don’t like the idea of hacking a response to contain a watermark. I also don’t like the idea of false positives detections coming directly from Anthropic. If people read more AI generated content, people will probably start writing more in that style
- pixl97 2mo agoI have no idea why you were down voted for this. Language is alive and people adopt it from sources they hear a lot.
- ack_complete 2mo agoMoreover, what if you quote text that happens to have been generated by Claude, does that bump up the AI-ness score of your source file or document?
- stranded22 2mo agoThe amount of times ‘delve’ appeared in general conversation in the last couple of years shows the influence LLMs have on society.
- reasonableklout 2mo agoThe flip side of this is that if AI-generated content becomes reliably identifiable and carries a stigma, then people might deliberately change their styles to be more diverse and human. One example I've seen are junior employees at my company deliberately adopting a lowercase/less punctuation writing style so as to stand apart from AI.