4 ms·

I appreciate you taking a side

• verdverm 2mo ago
  It's not taking a side, it's based in direct experience and observation. Has anyone actually used any of these "reimplementations" besides the people who created them (typically agi pilled) Why is it even valuable to fix that which is not broken? If you observe, those doing so are generating slop with Ai that is broken. Note, I'm not anti-ai, I'm for reasonable Ai, which includes understanding limitations instead of signing onto the hype bus
  • tonymet 2mo ago
    So it sounds like your position is that AI is not yet generating high fidelity solutions at a cost that would make reimplementation compelling. That's an okay position to have. That's what I would call, your side. I prefer hearing that to just a criticism of my side. thanks
    • verdverm 2mo ago
      > AI is not yet generating high fidelity solutions full stop, Ai is not as good as you believe it to be, look beyond the curtain It's not a side, it's reality, unless you believe there are multiple realities, which is plausible given today's media environment
      • tonymet 2mo ago
        There are hundreds of models and thousands of tools so this is about the most naive and disingenuous assessment imaginable