I'm not sure she needs to given the rest of the case against the author > Ms Wynn-Williams was told she must refrain from engaging in or "amplifying any furthe

I'm not sure she needs to given the rest of the case against the author > Ms Wynn-Williams was told she must refrain from engaging in or "amplifying any further disparaging, crucial or otherwise detrimental comments". > All previous disparaging comments "to the extent within her control" must also be retracted, the ruling also said She apparently isn't even allowed to criticise Meta in private. They're a horrible company but so many of that book read like poor fiction