3 ms·
Power law distributions are specializations of the more general Levy stable distributions [0] [1]. Levy stable distributions answer the following question: Giv
by abetusk 2mo ago
Power law distributions are specializations of the more general Levy stable distributions [0] [1]. Levy stable distributions answer the following question:
Given that the sum of independent and identically distributed random variables that converge to a distribution, what is the distribution they converge to?
If you answered Gaussian, you'd be wrong. The correct answer is Levy stable. There was no condition on finite variance. When variance can be infinite, Levy stable, or power law tail distributions, is the result. When the variance is finite, a Gaussian is the limiting distribution and, consequently, a Gaussian distribution is part of the family of Levy stable distributions.
The stability quality is the reason why the Levy stable (aka power law tail) distributions show up all over the place. If you've ever heard that the reason why the Normal distribution is called "normal", because the sums of (finite variance) random variables converges to a Gaussian, the same reasoning applies to the Levy stable. In some sense, Levy stable distributions are more normal than the normal distribution. My opinion is that infinite variance is hard for people to wrap their heads around, so they reject the premise.
Unfortunately I don't have a good answer for what the article brings up about the Fourier transform, but I'm almost positive that this can be answered with Levy stable distributions in mind. I will say that the distribution is often characterized by it's characteristic function. A short perusal of Wikipedia talks about Levy stable distributions being closed under Fourier transforms, which is what the article is talking about.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%C3%A9vy_distribution https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%C3%A9vy_distribution
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stable_distribution https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stable_distribution
- mturmon 2mo agoThis is mistaking two kinds of power laws. OP is considering power laws in the frequency domain. You are considering power laws in the heavy tail of a distribution. Different things! But there are confounders that make discussion seem similar: - questions about moments and convergence (OP: do we have finite energy in the Fourier domain; your comment: do the tails of the distribution fall off fast enough to have finite moments of order 1 or 2) - questions about averaging (OP: in the time domain; your comment: as an expectation obtained by integrating a distribution, or as a closure property of the stable class of distributions)