4 ms·
Once you're running a model inside the harness... you've got yourself a controller inside a control loop, which is genuinely a different kind of thing than just
by Kim_Bruning 2mo ago
Once you're running a model inside the harness... you've got yourself a controller inside a control loop, which is genuinely a different kind of thing than just the model alone.
Are you objecting to terminology here?
Are you proposing we say "Fable-In-Claude-Code tried..." instead?
Hmmm... something like that might be necessary. Sure we should typically be tolerant of loose language; but people do keep referring to wildly different contexts in ai conversations, and end up talking past each other.
Running gemini on web is a genuinely different experience to running Fable in claude code, different again from GPT-5.6 in openclaw, or in an ide or etc ...
- Silhouette 2mo agoYes - I'm objecting to the lazy use of terminology here. LLMs are useful in their own right and are not the real problem here. The real problem is people placing too much trust in inherently unreliable output and then trying to automate away their responsibility to check that output properly before using it.