2 ms·

And just like the panic over cell phones, this too shall pass. Maybe half of HN is too young to remember (or old enough to have forgotten?) but when cell phone

And just like the panic over cell phones, this too shall pass. Maybe half of HN is too young to remember (or old enough to have forgotten?) but when cell phones with cameras were becoming mainstream, there was media panic over them too - people could be discretely filming in bathrooms, locker rooms, etc. There were even a few high-profile salacious stories where people did use their phones to film inappropriately. And then we collectively decided that having cameras with us was generally beneficial and rarely harmful, and people realized that creeps who wanted to hide hidden cameras could already do so, and we all kinda moved on with our lives. I can't leave my house without being on a dozen Ring cameras, Flock cameras and probably a handful of satellites, along with devices tracking Bluetooth and WiFi IDs every time I enter a store or a cop car drives by or having my license plate scanned by passing tow trucks. Drawing the line at glasses seems pretty arbitrary.

otterley 2mo ago
This has been tried before, and Google Glass did not pass. As others have said across multiple threads here, there is a difference between passive recordings from fixed vantage points made by a property owner (or which are required, as with autonomous vehicles, to make the thing work at all), and having people you're talking to do it. The difference is the social aspect; people who wear them still seem antisocial to the rest of the population. People with normal vision who feel the need to constantly record the world around them from their own vantage point certainly seem creepy to me.
bookofjoe 2mo ago
see also: "Reefer Madness" (1936). What's old is new again. https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=reefer+madness https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=reefer+madness https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reefer_Madness https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reefer_Madness

otterley 2mo ago

This has been tried before, and Google Glass did not pass. As others have said across multiple threads here, there is a difference between passive recordings from fixed vantage points made by a property owner (or which are required, as with autonomous vehicles, to make the thing work at all), and having people you're talking to do it. The difference is the social aspect; people who wear them still seem antisocial to the rest of the population. People with normal vision who feel the need to constantly record the world around them from their own vantage point certainly seem creepy to me.

bookofjoe 2mo ago

see also: "Reefer Madness" (1936). What's old is new again. https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=reefer+madness https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=reefer+madness https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reefer_Madness https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reefer_Madness