4 ms·
I don't think so. There are many objections to methods of making learning "easier" and the invalidity of one does not imply the invalidity of all of them. We'v
by turzmo 2mo ago
I don't think so. There are many objections to methods of making learning "easier" and the invalidity of one does not imply the invalidity of all of them.
We've also seen the effects of LLMs on learning, at least when used instinctively by students. An entire generation of students seems to have atrophied their critical thinking skills this way. Talk to 21-year-olds today and you'll see what I mean.
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- engineer_22 2mo ago>There are many objections to methods of making learning "easier" and the invalidity of one does not imply the invalidity of all of them. I am pointing out a pattern of technological hubris stretching thousands of years. >An entire generation of students seems to have atrophied their critical thinking skills this way. Talk to 21-year-olds today and you'll see what I mean. Ah, yes, the old "kids these days" routine... quite fond of it myself sometimes. But I find myself benefitted when I take care to learn from the young.