3 ms·
> "setup a trigger that wipes a device" is already on shaky grounds It isn't on shaky grounds: you protect your private device from everyone, not just from som
by mdp2021 3mo ago
> "setup a trigger that wipes a device" is already on shaky grounds
It isn't on shaky grounds: you protect your private device from everyone, not just from some "law enforcement". If you want to protect your private device from any party (e.g. thieves, trivially), it will also be protected against law enforcement agents as a side effect.
- BoppreH 3mo agoWhat trigger would you setup to protect against thieves? I can't think of any that has the right sensitivity (not triggering if I start running to catch the bus), and won't escalate the violence (like my fingerprint wiping the phone in front of an armed robber). And remember that the context here is you explaining your digital booby trap to a judge who thinks you might have deliberately destroyed evidence.
- mdp2021 3mo ago> What trigger would you setup to protect against thieves? "Wipe the data after a number of failed logon attempts". I understand that this does not fit completely with the "in front of law enforcement" idea, but it opposes your «any solution that starts with "setup a trigger that wipes a device" [would be] already on shaky grounds»: we can very legitimately setup triggers that wipe devices in the possibility that the device falls into random hands.