3 ms·
rust programs are a lot of times faster and orders of magnitude safer than C and C++ counterparts... where is your data to support your assertion that rust prog
by jijji 2mo ago
rust programs are a lot of times faster and orders of magnitude safer than C and C++ counterparts... where is your data to support your assertion that rust programs use more resources than C and C++ programs?
- player1234 2mo ago[dead]
- lp4v4n 2mo ago>rust programs are a lot of times faster [...] than C and C++ counterparts Troll post? Or has fanboyism really gone this far?
- mhh__ 2mo agoIt's often basically true though - the guarantees that rust can make wrt to lifetimes and memory allocation clearly enable programs to allocate less and be more aggressive with what they do allocate (all while being a fairly high-level language - I don't know if most rust programmers actually know what memory safety is at this point) I'm really not a huge fan of rust as a language but it is clearly delivering results in that e.g. I find myself actively hoping that people rewrite web tooling in rust and so on. C++ is a mess that should be allowed to die.
- hulitu 2mo ago> it is clearly delivering results Yeah, there are some results in Firefox and some results in Mesa and some results in the linux kernel, but that's about all.
- pjc50 2mo agoRust is much less likely to have heap leaks.
- miah_ 2mo agoSome programmers import a sarcasm library while others could write their own.
- pelagicAustral 2mo agoTruly poor quality bait here.