6 ms·
I think all of Anthropic's own staff use --dangerously else they'd work on the usability of the massively imperfect 1-approve-once and 2-approve-forever multi-c
by paul_h 2mo ago
I think all of Anthropic's own staff use --dangerously else they'd work on the usability of the massively imperfect 1-approve-once and 2-approve-forever multi-choice and outcome.
- dannyw 2mo agoMaybe by design? 1. Metrics show auto or YOLO mode users have higher retention 2. Company intentionally doesn’t invest in manual mode
- usef- 2mo agoThat's exactly why Auto mode was made, and reportedly what they all use. It's the easy option, with a better safety score than human review. (This isn't vibes: they're red-teaming Auto mode heavily)
- coldtea 2mo ago>with a better safety score than human review. According to them - for things they care about.
- ValentineC 2mo ago> It's the easy option, with a better safety score than human review. Considering I went through a phase before I started using Claude Code where I'd eventually reach a point where I'd mindlessly approve ridiculously long command chains, I believe this. As the article writes: "many users are clicking through reflexively rather than reviewing each command". It's far better (for my working style, anyway) to have some external isolation/sandboxing, but leave the actual command approval to LLM.
- coldtea 2mo ago>else they'd work on the usability of the massively imperfect 1-approve-once and 2-approve-forever multi-choice and outcome. Their profit motive is in NOT improving that, and luring you to depend all the more automatically to Claude.