You make a lot of assumptions here... that I disagree with something about the article (aside from with its quality) and post rationalized somehow, that it has

You make a lot of assumptions here... that I disagree with something about the article (aside from with its quality) and post rationalized somehow, that it has anything to do with em-dashes, that they just used AI for "post editorial process". None of that is true. What is there to disagree with? It's not making a statement or taking a stance, it's a technical writeup and I included a technical quote from the article which would be weird whether or not it was AI written. It's not post edited by AI, it's written whole cloth by AI. No human cared enough to write it. Possibly if it was better quality you could make the case that's ok, but I suspect that you didn't read the article at all.