4 ms·
MV3 is severely limited in what it can do. One example that blew my mind is that chrome happily renders webpages immediately after application launch, while ext
by s3p 2mo ago
MV3 is severely limited in what it can do. One example that blew my mind is that chrome happily renders webpages immediately after application launch, while extensions are still loading.
Firefox, in contrast, doesn't let the network request fire off to the page until every extension is ready. So chrome is essentially screwing over the user, letting ads/ blocked content load, and intentionally degrading their experience, to make things appear slightly faster.
- taviso 2mo agoThat's nothing to do with MV3 though, that was also true with MV2. The situation actually seems improved in MV3, because static (and dynamic, IIRC) DNR rules are initialized and enforced immediately, right?
- charcircuit 2mo ago>MV3 is severely limited in what it can do. Yet, I never see ads since ad blockers still have enough power to block ads.
- nophunphil 2mo ago“If I can’t see it, it must not be there”
- charcircuit 2mo agoThat's the point of an adblocker. Web pages have ads, but with the extension they aren't there.
- sensanaty 2mo agouBlock does a lot more than just block ads, is the thing, and that's what they killed with MV3. https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-best-on-Firefox https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-b...