3 ms·

https://design.withfudge.com https://design.withfudge.com. It gives agents the ability to find website design references to improve their design skills via the

https://design.withfudge.com https://design.withfudge.com. It gives agents the ability to find website design references to improve their design skills via the mcp - https://design.withfudge.com/mcp https://design.withfudge.com/mcp You can also critic your existing designs against competition.

jjcm 2mo ago
Some feedback: When I enter a url to give me feedback for, it prompts signin, then returns you to the homepage instead of a review for the url you wanted a review for. Conversations on the left should be named. Right now they're just "new conversation". These name themselves after the conversation is complete, but you should be able to fire off a query to a smaller LLM based on the prompt to name them asap. The biggest thing though, the feedback it gave me was incorrect. Not the subjective parts, but the objective bits were incorrect. Here's what it told me: > Change: Make the first viewport a contained product argument: > 1. Navigation and one primary action > 2. Short headline and supporting sentence > 3. A real prompt-to-interface example > 4. One compact proof point or “before / after” comparison My landing page (https://diffui.ai https://diffui.ai) has nav and one primary action. It has a short headline and a supporting sentence. It has a real prompt-to-interface example. It has a before (prompt) and after (multipage web design) in the example. I suspect that it got confused due to this being an interactive example, but a lot of this (the headline/supporting sentence) are present in the screenshot it took. Overall though not a bad start. Good work sourcing references.
- sim04ful 2mo ago
  Thanks for the feedback, working on it.
- sim04ful 2mo ago
  Could you by any chance, share the conversation link here ? there's a share button at the top right
  - jjcm 2mo ago
    https://chat.withfudge.com/share/0gqaxigvh1/give_me_feedback_for_diffui_ai/ https://chat.withfudge.com/share/0gqaxigvh1/give_me_feedback...

jjcm 2mo ago

Some feedback: When I enter a url to give me feedback for, it prompts signin, then returns you to the homepage instead of a review for the url you wanted a review for. Conversations on the left should be named. Right now they're just "new conversation". These name themselves after the conversation is complete, but you should be able to fire off a query to a smaller LLM based on the prompt to name them asap. The biggest thing though, the feedback it gave me was incorrect. Not the subjective parts, but the objective bits were incorrect. Here's what it told me: > Change: Make the first viewport a contained product argument: > 1. Navigation and one primary action > 2. Short headline and supporting sentence > 3. A real prompt-to-interface example > 4. One compact proof point or “before / after” comparison My landing page (https://diffui.ai https://diffui.ai) has nav and one primary action. It has a short headline and a supporting sentence. It has a real prompt-to-interface example. It has a before (prompt) and after (multipage web design) in the example. I suspect that it got confused due to this being an interactive example, but a lot of this (the headline/supporting sentence) are present in the screenshot it took. Overall though not a bad start. Good work sourcing references.

sim04ful 2mo ago
Thanks for the feedback, working on it.
sim04ful 2mo ago
Could you by any chance, share the conversation link here ? there's a share button at the top right
- jjcm 2mo ago
  https://chat.withfudge.com/share/0gqaxigvh1/give_me_feedback_for_diffui_ai/ https://chat.withfudge.com/share/0gqaxigvh1/give_me_feedback...