2 ms·
If a professional group of people are wasting their time and attention on you then it's fruitful to imagine what resources they may have to leverage against you
by serf 2mo ago
If a professional group of people are wasting their time and attention on you then it's fruitful to imagine what resources they may have to leverage against you, I don't think that's hard to argue.
Few people cave when there are lots of eyes on them., and less people make empty threats with a bar full of spectators - that's why punches get thrown.
Regardless : 'I'm a renter' is by no means a strong argument unless you have a very specifically worded renter agreement -- it's pretty obviously a bad idea to anger the crowd of presumably better paying tenants, what would you do as a land owner, kick out the group every other tenant hates or change policy to protect the small fry?
- jstummbillig 2mo ago> what would you do as a land owner Nothing. You would do nothing. You want both to stay, because you also don't enjoy losing any amount of money, and not doing anything is most likely going to get you that. From the "I'll get you thrown out"-party, it's the same tactic again, directed at the landlord this time. Moving buildings is neither fun nor cheap. Your employees would have to go somewhere else, there might not be anywhere else close by that is convenient to you or as nice/familiar as the place you got, some people might quit over any annoyance this brings too. Nobody enjoys this shit. There are contracts. There are lawyers. It's never fun to do these things and it can all be dragged out for a long time. Being a somewhat bigger renter is (fortunately) not something that helps you in a court of law. > Regardless : 'I'm a renter' is by no means a strong argument unless you have a very specifically worded renter agreement It's a very strong default argument, unless you have a specifically worded agreement, that would strip you of a potential right.