3 ms·
This post misses a couple of points 1.”Writing software was never the hard part” - isn’t saying coding was easy. The comparison was against building a viable p
by jemiluv8 2mo ago
This post misses a couple of points
1.”Writing software was never the hard part” - isn’t saying coding was easy. The comparison was against building a viable product. Doing business involves a whole lot more ambiguity than sitting in your room writing code. You could build anything and yet the hard part was building something that matters
2. >> Nobody knows how the AI revolution will play out in the end
I disagree with this statement as far as Software Engineering is concerned. We kinda know. Everyone uses an agent harness to code this days - the only real difference is in how - and that still sets developers apart but most are using similar tools.
This reads more and more like clickbait. Sorry. I always find posts like this outrageous but I suppose that was the author’s intent. Outrage will get you votes. Taking extreme positions in an argument will get you attention. Kuddos
- jerhewet 2mo ago> Everyone uses an agent harness to code this days No we don't. I don't care what's at stake; I will never use spicy auto-complete.
- jemiluv8 2mo agoNearly everyone I suppose. There are always outliers I suppose. I’m going for 90%+ using llm in some capacity even if just a single ChatGPT prompt.
- ____mr____ 2mo ago"just a single ChatGPT prompt" is quite far away from "everyone uses an agent harness"