I'm sorry, you're going to have to dumb it down for me. Are you saying it's "conceivable but unlikely" that courts will find that LLM generated code is owned, c

I'm sorry, you're going to have to dumb it down for me. Are you saying it's "conceivable but unlikely" that courts will find that LLM generated code is owned, collectively, by the millions of people who's code was used in training data? Or is it's "conceivable but unlikely" that LLM generated code will be owned by the person who's prompts elicited the output?