From the paper you cite, here's the thing: "The decarbonization of industrial hard-to-abate sectors through CCUS is critical, and that can be illustrated by lo

From the paper you cite, here's the thing: "The decarbonization of industrial hard-to-abate sectors through CCUS is critical, and that can be illustrated by looking at the target sources, such as the cement industry, accountable for 6–7% of global anthropogenic emissions [1]; or the steel manufacturing value chain, responsible for 7% of global energy-related emissions [2]. Given such dimensions, it can be concluded that carbon capture is critical to achieving CO2 restriction goals." "In the cement industry it is worth highlighting that 60–70% of the total emissions of CO2 does not come from fuel combustion, but from the decomposition of the limestone into calcium oxide and CO2 " So you can't get past 90% in the first place without carbon sequestration. We have the same goal, but we see different paths to achieving it. I think if we do what it takes with carbon sequestration, the free market solves this for real as more and more profitable renewable power generation is stood up. But I do not believe that happens without the fossil fuel incumbents soft landing or finding bagholders to take the hit in the long run. And I won't count on Americans to demand better given all it took was the president to say he hates EVs and EV sales plummeted. Personally, my house is more or less off the grid electrically already with a ton of solar panels and 75 kWH of battery backup. I voted with my wallet.