2 ms·
Very detailed site. It said open source. where is the source?
by frankensteins 2mo ago
Very detailed site. It said open source. where is the source?
- gregsadetsky 2mo agohttps://gitlab.com/globus-faber-public/eclipsefan https://gitlab.com/globus-faber-public/eclipsefan
- ButlerianJihad 2mo agoNeither of the two licenses are open-source licenses. In particular, the licenses are encumbered by the noncommercial restrictions. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ The outputs, rather than the source code, are said to be under this CC-BY-NC-SA licensing. https://opensource.org/osd https://opensource.org/osd I am not familiar with Polyform, but my cursory research indicates that this family of licenses is deliberately and consistently non-open-source. https://polyformproject.org/about https://polyformproject.org/about It is profoundly deceptive to post this headlining as "Open-source" when it is deliberately not.