>If you replaced your art team with an AI I won’t give you my money. If you lie about it then you’re just a scumbag. Does this mean reducing number of employee

>If you replaced your art team with an AI I won’t give you my money. If you lie about it then you’re just a scumbag. Does this mean reducing number of employees on art team to zero is bad? >If your professional artists are using AI for their own work à la how I use it to generate code, I’m less bothered, particularly if they’re iterating on their own artistic inputs. Does this mean reducing number of employees on art team to a number greater than one is acceptable? >It’s just a matter of principle. I am having trouble understanding the principle. If I interpreted correctly, then what is special about reducing number of employees to 0 rather than reducing them to some other amount.