2 ms·
> I don't think this clear lack of ability is some conspiracy. Maybe currently not. But we will never be able to know, as models are undeterministic and benchm
by frevib 2mo ago
> I don't think this clear lack of ability is some conspiracy.
Maybe currently not. But we will never be able to know, as models are undeterministic and benchmarks are kind of scams. When you cannot prove that something gets worse, rest assured companies will to it.
- nomel 2mo agoThis requires something other than a free market, and for China to not exist. We're not there yet. There's plenty of competition to prevent this, for now, with AI spending being an incredibly hot issue.
- frevib 2mo agoCurrently the bad quality of architecture and holistic view of models is probably explained by the fact that the models just cannot do it. Free markets and China will make sure of that, kind of. In reality Claude and Codex are better and provide much better tooling, so not much competition from free markets and self-hosted models from China, I think. Then when competition really settles to monoploy or duopoly, like it always does in bigtech, it is really difficult to prove Anthropic and OpenAI enshittify their models. Same with Opus 4.6, that suddenly was worse when 4.7 came out.
- nomel 2mo ago> Currently the bad quality of architecture and holistic view of models is probably explained by the fact that the models just cannot do it. Free markets and China will make sure of that, kind of. I'm not following. Free markets and China will make sure that models stay bad!? Why didn't these entities already stop the progression we've seen? What has been motivating them all this time that has preventing them from stopping? Keep in mind this was all science fiction just a few years ago.